• March 14, 2010

An earlier post highlighted a “smackdown” in which the NAF received a stinging denial on a motion to dismiss (here).  Unsurprisingly, the NAF would like to put the brakes on everything while they appeal the denial of their motion to dismiss.

Not going to happen.  U.S. District Court Judge Paul Magnuson does not seem to have bought NAF defendants’ claims that they “face several impending discovery and other deadlines” that make expedited review of the Motion to Stay necessary to “prevent prejudice.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *